TRUST AND VERIFICATION
Trust supported by evidence
Broad labels do not reduce risk—evidence does. Tiravya structures verification so you can see what was reviewed, how it was reviewed, when it was reviewed, what remains pending and which risks require attention.
What Tiravya verifies
Depending on the engagement, verification and coordination can cover the counterparty's identity, capability, quality practices, documentation and destination-market compliance readiness.
Business Verification
Review of available registrations, operating identity, management information and relevant trade credentials.
Capability Verification
Factory visits, production-capability reviews, equipment checks, capacity assessment and references where appropriate.
Quality Coordination
Samples, technical clarifications, testing, third-party inspection, non-conformance reporting and corrective-action follow-up.
Documentation Readiness
Coordination of commercial, shipping, inspection and product documentation between the responsible parties.
Country-Specific Compliance
Identification and coordination of applicable destination-market documentation, testing, certification and specialist support.
Transaction Visibility
Clear milestones across RFQ, sampling, production, inspection, shipment, delivery and payment.
Verification methods
Methods are matched to the engagement and the market. Typical methods include:
- Review of available registrations and public records
- Site and factory visits with photographic notes
- Management interviews and reference checks
- Sample evaluation against agreed specifications
- Coordination of third-party inspection and testing
- Documentation and compliance readiness review
Verification levels
Each level builds on the one before it. These are Tiravya's internal review levels—they are not government certifications, and the scope of each level varies by engagement.
Identity reviewed
Available registrations, operating identity and management information have been reviewed.
Capability reviewed
Production capability, equipment, capacity and relevant references have been assessed.
Commercial readiness reviewed
Pricing, lead times, documentation readiness and transaction terms have been evaluated.
Transaction performance recorded
Actual performance across completed transactions has been observed and recorded.
What a verification record looks like
Every engagement produces a clear record of checks, methods, evidence, status and limitations. The example below is illustrative only and does not describe any real company.
| Check | Method | Date | Evidence | Status | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business registration | Review of available registration records | Week 1 | Registration extract on file | Reviewed | Reflects records available at review date |
| Operating identity | Site visit and management discussion | Week 2 | Visit notes and photographs | Reviewed | Single-site visit; other locations not covered |
| Production capability | Factory walk-through and equipment check | Week 2 | Capability summary | Reviewed | Capacity stated by management; not independently metered |
| Quality system | Documentation review | Week 3 | Procedure documents sighted | Pending | Third-party audit not yet scheduled |
| Product sample | Sample evaluation against specification | Week 4 | Sample report | Client confirmation required | Final technical approval rests with the client |
| Laboratory testing | Accredited third-party laboratory | Scheduled | Awaiting test certificate | Specialist confirmation required | Testing performed by the authorised laboratory |
| Export licence | Applicability assessment | Week 1 | Assessment note | Not applicable | Product category not licence-controlled at review date |
- Reviewed:
- Checked by Tiravya with evidence recorded
- Pending:
- Planned or in progress, not yet completed
- Client confirmation required:
- Final approval rests with the client
- Specialist confirmation required:
- Requires an appropriately authorised specialist
- Not applicable:
- Assessed as not relevant to this engagement
Limitations and client responsibility
Verification reduces risk. It does not replace the client's final technical, legal or commercial approval. Reviews reflect the information available at the review date, and conditions at a counterparty can change.
Statutory, contractual, technical and product responsibilities remain with the relevant buyer, seller, importer, exporter and appropriately authorised specialists. Where regulated confirmation is required—such as laboratory testing, inspection certificates or legal opinions—it is provided by the authorised specialist, coordinated by Tiravya.